Luter v. Hammon’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2017
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Deliberto v. Hartford Insurance Co. · 443 So. 2d 1173 - WOODLAND HILLS CONS. ASS'N v. City of Jackson · Board of Aldermen, City of Clinton v. Conerly · 489 So. 2d 501 - Broadacres, Inc. v. City of Hattiesburg · 423 So. 2d 1323 - Bd. of Aldermen of Town of Bay Springs v. Jenkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. Luter v. Hammon, 529 So.2d 625, 628 (Miss.1988). Specifically, the fairly debatable standard applies to the legislative questions whether there has been a change in the character of the neighborhood and whether there is a public need for the rezoning. If these two questions may, on the matters before the Mayor and Board of Aldermen, be said fairly debatable, there is no judicial authority to interfere and the action taken by the city zoning authorities, be it pro or con the proposed rezoning, must be allowed to stand. Id.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) there was a mistake in the original zoning or (2)(a) the character of the neighborhood has changed to such an extent as to justify rezoning and (b) that a public need exists for rezoning.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Saunders v. City of Jackson, 511 So.2d 902, 906 (Miss.1987).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.