Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 529 SO2D 635 - Chisolm v. State

Chisolm v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

77
cited by 77 later decisions
4
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

73 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably 592 So. 2d 114 - Hansen v. State (1991), 645 So. 2d 829 - Chase v. State (1994)

73 state decisions

3501988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · McCleskey v. Kemp · Ross v. Oklahoma · 517 So. 2d 1346 - Lockett v. State · 476 So. 2d 130 - Bertolotti v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is the essence of our system of courts and laws that every party is entitled to a fair and impartial jury. It is a fundamental tenet of our system that a man may not judge his own case, for experience teaches that men are usually not impartial and fair when self interest is involved. Therefore, it is improper to permit an attorney to tell the jury to put themselves in the shoes of one of the parties or to apply the golden rule. Attorneys should not tell a jury, in effect, that the law authorizes it to depart from neutrality and to make its determination from the point of view of bias or personal interest.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “sufficiently insignificant in the overall context of the case.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]hat the prosecutor accepted other black persons as jurors is no defense to a Batson claim,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.