Kaye v. Kaye’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 1991
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Laiche v. Laiche
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(A) An award for support shall not be reduced or increased unless the party seeking the reduction or increase shows a change in circumstances of one of the parties between the time of the previous award and the time of the motion for modification of the award.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“"Once the appellant presented evidence of a change in circumstances, he had established a prima facie case for entitlement to a reduction in his support obligations. The burden then shifted to the appellee to refute that entitlement with proof that the change in circumstances was caused by the appellant's own voluntary actions. Since she failed to meet that burden, the trial court should have permanently reduced the appellant's child support obligation."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.