¶1WRIT DENIED: There is no error in the ruling complained of. An in camera inspection by the trial court to determine whether or not an attorney’s file contains discoverable material is not a violation of C.C.P. art. 1422 et seq. Also, see McHugh v. Chastant, 503 So.2d 791 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1987).
529 So. 2d 888
Venable v. Smith
Decided August 26, 1988
Louisiana Court of Appeal · decided 1988-08-26
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2018
1 state decisions
Relies on 503 So. 2d 791 - McHugh v. Chastant
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1988-08-26
View the full empirical analysis of this case →