Talbert v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “sufficiently in advance of trial such that granting the request will not: (1) interfere with the orderly administration of the business of the court, (2) result in unnecessary delay or inconvenience to witnesses, or (3) prejudice the State.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. The People of the State of Colorado, Petitioner: v. K.L.W. Respondent: In the Interest of Minor Children: Kay. W., Kai.W., E.W., D.W., and S.W., and Kay. W., Kai.W., E.W., D.W., and S.W., Petitioners:

2. “the trial court's finding that withdrawal would have interfered with the orderly administration of the court's business.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. The People of the State of Colorado, Petitioner: v. K.L.W. Respondent: In the Interest of Minor Children: Kay. W., Kai.W., E.W., D.W., and S.W., and Kay. W., Kai.W., E.W., D.W., and S.W., Petitioners: