Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 529 U.S. 277 - City of Erie v. Pap's A. M.

City of Erie v. Pap's A. M.’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

1,715
cited by 1,715 later decisions
16
cited 16 times by the Supreme Court
34
states following
June 2026
most recently cited

481 federal appellate · 228 district · 308 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,715 later decisions (16 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2026 · most notably Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly (2001), City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc. (2002)

481 federal appellate · 228 district · 308 state decisions — followed in 34 states

1.1k0200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · United States v. O'Brien · United States v. W. T. Grant Co. · Ward v. Rock Against Racism · Powell v. McCormack

Cited together with City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc. · United States v. O'Brien · Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc. · City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc. · Ward v. Rock Against Racism

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,715 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “within the outer ambit of the First Amendment's protection.”
    81 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A case is moot when the issues presented are no longer `live' or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome.”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “so long as whatever evidence the city relies upon is reasonably believed to be relevant to the problem that the city addresses.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.