Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 529 U.S. 446 - Edwards Warden v. Carpenter

Edwards Warden v. Carpenter’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

1,586
cited by 1,586 later decisions
7
cited 7 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

325 federal appellate · 244 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,586 later decisions (7 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Rose v. Lee (2001), 132 S. Ct. 1309 - Martinez v. Ryan (2012)

325 federal appellate · 244 district · 26 state decisions

1.1k0200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedCarpenter v. Mohr (from Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · North Carolina v. Alford · Coleman v. Thompson · Wainwright v. Sykes · Murray v. Carrier

Cited together with Coleman v. Thompson · Strickland v. Washington · Murray v. Carrier · Williams v. Taylor · Schlup v. Delo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,586 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In other words, ineffective assistance adequate to establish cause for the procedural default of some other constitutional claim is itself an independent constitutional claim.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “at trial, on appeal, or on state collateral attack,”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim asserted as cause for the procedural default of another claim”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.