Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 529 U.S. 803 - United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.

United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

1,554
cited by 1,554 later decisions
58
cited 58 times by the Supreme Court
36
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

477 federal appellate · 197 district · 313 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,554 later decisions (58 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2026 · most notably Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010), Ashcroft Attorney General v. Free Speech Coalition (2002)

477 federal appellate · 197 district · 313 state decisions — followed in 36 states

8850200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 47 U.S.C. § 223 · 47 U.S.C. § 559 · 47 U.S.C. § 560 · 47 U.S.C. § 561

Relies on Hamling v. United States · Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District · Roth v. United States · Ward v. Rock Against Racism · Miller v. California

Cited together with Ward v. Rock Against Racism · Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission · Rav v. City of St Paul Minnesota · Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union · Leila Jeanne Hill Audrey Himmelmann Everitt Simpsons v. Colorado

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,554 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When the Government restricts speech, the Government bears the burden of proving the constitutionality of its actions.”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If a less restrictive alternative would serve the Government's purpose, the legislature must use that alternative.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he distinction between laws burdening and laws banning speech is but a matter of degree.”). Utah's regulations still burden speech, even if they fall short of being a”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.