Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 Ala. App. 518 - Watts v. State

53 Ala. App. 518 - Watts v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
3
states following
August 1996
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently August 1996 · most notably 683 So. 2d 1042 - Ex Parte Windsor (1996), 683 So. 2d 1027 - Windsor v. State (1994)

35 state decisions

180197419801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Swain v. State of Alabama · Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co. · Smith v. Texas · Ballard v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The presumption in any particular case must be that the prosecutor is using the State's challenges to obtain a fair and impartial jury to try the case before the court. The presumption is not overcome and the prosecutor therefore subjected to examination by allegations that in the case at hand all Negroes were removed from the jury or that they were removed because they were Negroes. Any other result, we think, would establish a rule wholly at odds with the peremptory challenge system as we know it. Hence the motion to strike the trial jury was properly denied in this case."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “an examination of the prosecutor's reason for the exercise of his challenge in any given case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.