53 Ala. App. 700 - Davis v. Wolff’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

10 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Id. We agree with the Court of Civil Appeals in its reiteration of the long-standing and well-settled principle of our cases that a trial court's findings and conclusions on the facts will not be reviewed when it affirmatively appears there was evidence before the trial court which was not in the record on appeal, and that where all the evidence is not in the record, it is presumed the missing evidence is sufficient to support the judgment appealed from. We further agree with its analysis and conclusions with respect to the”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 364 So. 2d 1168 - Smith v. Haynes

2. ““By agreement of the parties, this portion of the testimony of the witness was taken outside the presence of the court reporter and the substance of this testimony on direct examination was as follows : * * * ””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Davis v. Wolff

3. ““During oral argument of this case before this court both parties admitted that the entire verbatim transcript of the plaintiff’s testimony in chief was not before this court.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Davis v. Wolff