¶1The consideration of the contract is not set forth in the written evidence of it, and the proof to show what the consideration was does not vary the terms of the writing. The court’s finding of facts is sustained by the evidence, and the judgment is affirmed.
53 Ark. 4
Fitzpatrick v. Moore
Decided March 1, 1890
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1909
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1890-03-01
View the full empirical analysis of this case →