Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

53 Ark. 67

Beasley v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 22, 1890

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1890-03-22

B. F. Askew, Judge. Appellant Beasley was surety on a bail bond for one Grant ■Capehart in Columbia circuit court upon a charge of perjury. Upon the application of1 Capehart, a change of venue to Ouachita circuit court was granted, the court directing that Capehart be held upon his present recognizance for his appearance before said court. During the trial Capehart absconded.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1890-03-22

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 1924

3 state decisions

101890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per CURIAM.

¶1The bond of Capehart stipulated that he should render himself amenable to all orders and process of, the court, in the prosecution of the charge. On his petition the court ordered him to Ouachita county for trial. His surety, under the terms of his contract, was bound to see to his attendance. Section 2199, Mansfield’s Digest, is directory merely.

¶2The allegation in the answer that the defendant was acquitted, was refuted by other allegations in the answer and the record, which show that the court refused to receive the verdict in the absence of the defendant.

¶3Affirmed.

/53/ark/67 · .json · Public domain