Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 Ark. App. 90 - Johns v. Johns

53 Ark. App. 90 - Johns v. Johns’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
November 2008
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Epperson v. Arkansas · Pater v. Pater · Burns v. Burns · Felton v. Felton · 79 Wash. 2d 810 - Munoz v. Munoz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The chancellor did not order him to attend religious services, but rather that he see that his children did so in order to maintain consistency in the religious regimen that their mother has set for them. Therefore, no limitation has been placed on appellant's freedom of religion. Because the chancellor's order imposes no duty on him to attend, appellant is free to attend or not attend the services with the children.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.