Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 CAL2D 347 - Florez v. Groom Development Co.

Florez v. Groom Development Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

147
cited by 147 later decisions
3
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 136 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 147 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably 22 Cal. 3d 67 - People v. Cook (1978), 227 Cal. App. 2d 675 - Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304 (1964)

5 federal appellate · 136 state decisions

9601959196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 3 Cal. 2d 427 - Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co. · Mosley v. Arden Farms Co. · 44 Cal. 2d 225 - Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co. · 34 Cal. 2d 226 - Blumberg v. M. & T. Incorporated · 41 Cal. 2d 419 - Peters v. City & County of San Francisco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 147 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`The applicable general principle is that the owner of the property, insofar as an invitee is concerned, is not an insurer of safety but must use reasonable care to keep his premises in a reasonably safe condition and give warning of latent or concealed peril. He is not liable for injury to an invitee resulting from a danger which was obvious or should have been observed in the exercise of reasonable care.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he dangerous plank was the only means furnished to reach that faucet”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.