Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 Cal. 4th 945 - Quarry v. Doe I

53 Cal. 4th 945 - Quarry v. Doe I’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc. · 44 Cal. 3d 1188 - Evangelatos v. Superior Court · Stogner v. California · 35 Cal. 4th 797 - Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. · 57 Cal. 2d 167 - DiGenova v. State Board of Education

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “' "statute may be applied retroactively only if it contains express language of retroactivity or if other sources provide a clear and unavoidable implication that the Legislature intended retroactive application”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “if the person or entity knew or had reason to know, or was otherwise on notice, of any unlawful sexual conduct by an employee, volunteer, representative, or agent, and failed to take reasonable steps, and to implement reasonable safeguards, to avoid acts of unlawful sexual conduct in the future by that person, including, but not limited to, preventing or avoiding placement of that person in a function or environment in which contact with children is an inherent part of that function or environment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'the age 26 cutoff as against a narrow category of third party defendants who had both the knowledge and the ability to protect against abusive behavior [by an employee, volunteer, representative, or agent], but failed to do so. Anyone discovering that childhood abuse was the cause of the injuries after 2003 could sue these-more culpable-defendants without regard to the age 26 cutoff.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.