Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 Cal. App. 4th 692 - Jacobs v. Universal Development Corp.

53 Cal. App. 4th 692 - Jacobs v. Universal Development Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
4
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably 44 Cal. 4th 876 - Miklosy v. Regents of the University of California (2008), Strozinsky v. School District of Brown Deer (2000)

24 state decisions

200199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 47 Cal. 3d 654 - Foley v. Interactive Data Corp. · 9 Cal. 3d 566 - Gruenberg v. Aetna Insurance · 27 Cal. 3d 167 - Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co. · 7 Cal. 4th 1238 - Turner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. · 174 Cal. App. 2d 184 - Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`intended to prevent the guilty party from reaping the benefit of his wrongful conduct, or to protect the public from the future consequences of an illegal contract.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.