Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 COLO 205 - Richards v. Stewart

Richards v. Stewart’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 1944
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 1944

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

401912192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Juilliard v. . Chaffee · Mills v. Hart · Rice v. Bush · Howard v. Stratton · Tucker v. Tucker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In passing upon a motion by one party for judgment upon the pleadings, after issue joined, all the material allegations of the opposite party must be taken as true; and if the pleadings of the opposite party, though defective in form, are nevertheless sufficient in substance to sustain a judgment in his favor, the motion should not be granted.” Rice v. Bush, 16 Colo. 484, 488 , 27 Pac. 720 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.