Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 COLO 340 - Ferris v. Curtis

Ferris v. Curtis’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
February 1988
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 1988

6 state decisions

2019121920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thomas v. Carey · Cross v. Moffat · Holmquist v. Gilbert · Toothaker v. City of Boulder · Sears v. Hicklin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . the efficiency of the payment to avert the effect of the statute of limitations as a bar, rests in the conscious and voluntary act of the defendant, explainable only as a recognition and confession of the existing liability.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.