State v. Valinski’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
November 2007
most recently cited
22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Sandstrom v. Montana · State v. Golding · State v. Evans · Garber v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Dawn Gallo, Deputy Assistant State’s Attorney]: What did [the result of the third field sobriety test] indicate? [Albanese]: There was another building block with the priors that the person was operating under the influence. [Gallo]: Now, based upon your experience and training and what you had just seen the defendant do, you are talking with him and you are following him in your car, did you form an opinion as to the state of sobriety? [Albanese]: Yes. [Gallo]: And what was that opinion? [Albanese]: I believe he was operating under the influence.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Valinski, supra, 53 Conn. App. 27 -28 n.8.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Valinski
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.