Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 CONNAPP 507 - State v. Jacques

State v. Jacques’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 2012

23 state decisions

180199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Rhode Island v. Innis · Dunn v. United States · Lord Electric Co. v. United States · United States v. S.A. Empresa de Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As [the Connecticut courts] have often noted, proof beyond a reasonable doubt does not mean proof beyond all possible doubt . . . nor does proof beyond a reasonable doubt require acceptance of every hypothesis of innocence posed by the defendant that, had it been found credible by the [jury], would have resulted in an acquittal. . . . It is also the absolute right and responsibility of the jury to weigh conflicting evidence and to determine the credibility of the witnesses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.