Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 F.1d 471 - Third Nat. Bank v. Gordon

Third Nat. Bank v. Gordon’s Empirical Analysis

53 F. 471 · 1892

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
July 1908
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Babbitt v. Finn · Gordon v. Third Nat. Bank of Chattanooga · Smith v. Gaines

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The nature and character of a supersedeas bond seem to imply a more summary remedy upon it than a suit to enforce it. The plaintiff’s judgment is superseded, and he is for the time deprived of his remedy by execution to obtain the fruits of his judgment. The supersedeas bond is given and approved by the judge of the court in which the cause was heard and the judgment obtained; and the giving and acceptance of such bond are, to some extent, like a confession of judgment, if the appellant fails to maintain his contention in the appellate court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.