Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 F.1d 476 - In re Interstate Commerce Commission

In re Interstate Commerce Commission’s Empirical Analysis

53 F. 476 · 1892

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
June 1897
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Osborn v. President Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States · Bozza v. United States · Hayburn's case · Smith v. Adams · In re McLean

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Undoubtedly, Congress may confer upon a non-judicial body authority to obtain information necessary for legitimate governmental purposes, and make refusal to appear and testify before it touching matters pertinent to any authorized inquiry, an offence punishable by the courts, subject, however, to the privilege of witnesses to make no disclosures which might tend to criminate them or subject them to penalties or forfeitures. A prosecution or an action for violation of-such a statute would clearly be an original suit or controversy between parties within the meaning of the Constitution, and not a mere application, like the present one, for the exercise of' the judicial power in aid of a non-judicial body.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The judicial power shall extend to all cases in law and equity arising under the Constitution, the laws of the United States and treaties made, or which shall be made under their authority, . . . to controversies to which the United States shall be a party, . . . e'tc.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.