Hammett v. Ruby Lee Minar, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
53 F.2d 144 · 1931
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 5 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 1990
4 federal appellate · 5 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Railway Company v. McCarthy · Kothe v. R. C. Taylor Trust · Duryea Power Co. v. Sternbergh · Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. W. R. Grace & Co. · Ridings v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“These contracts, made in these circumstances, between parties situated as these parties were, cannot receive the sanction of a court of equity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.