Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 F.2d 900 - In re Hargraves

In re Hargraves’s Empirical Analysis

53 F.2d 900 · 1931

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
April 1999
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently April 1999 · most notably In re Dembiczak (1999), Carman Industries, Inc. v. Wahl (1983)

12 federal appellate · 1 district ·

1101931194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miller v. Eagle Manuf'G Co · Agawam Company v. Jordan · Mitchell v. Tilghman · H. C. White Co. v. Morton E. Converse & Son Co. · In re Walter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. [D]ouble patenting exists if the feature in which the novel esthetic effect resides is the identical feature which produces the novel function so that a structure embodying the mechanical invention would of necessity embody the design, and vice versa.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.