Jackson v. Swift Eckrich, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
53 F.3d 1452 · 1995
Citation profile
21 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently October 2014 · most notably Been v. O.K. Industries, Inc. (2007), Varner v. Peterson Farms (2004)
21 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 15 (§ 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 7 U.S.C. § 182 · 7 U.S.C. § 191 · 7 U.S.C. § 192 · 7 U.S.C. § 193 · 7 U.S.C. § 197 · 7 U.S.C. § 201 · 7 U.S.C. § 209
Relies on Reiter v. Cooper · Lassiter v. Department of Social Services · Michigan Canners & Freezers Assn., Inc. v. Agricultural Marketing and Bargaining Bd. · McClenegman v. Union Stock Yards Co. · Farrow v. United States Department of Agriculture
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“traditional principles of freedom of contract.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“ordinarily requires a plaintiff to pursue relief, when available, from an administrative agency before proceeding to the courts”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the full amount of damages sustained in consequence of such violation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.