Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

53 F.3d 335

Docket No. 94-3049

Neal v. Norris

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: May 4, 1995 Filed: May 8, 1995

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-05-04

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently September 2007

2 federal appellate · 4 district ·

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. Bonfil-Dominguez

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-05-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Rickey L. Neal appeals the District Court's1 denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude the District Court correctly denied relief. Accordingly, the District Court's judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny the motion to supplement the record on appeal.

1

The Honorable Elsijane T. Roy, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable John F. Forster, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas

/53/f3d/335 · .json · Public domain