Coyne v. Taber Partners I’s Empirical Analysis
53 F.3d 454 · 1995
Citation profile
56 federal appellate · 66 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 142 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably McCarthy v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. (1995), Martinez v. Colon (1995)
56 federal appellate · 66 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Gregory Lumber Co. v. United States · Morrison v. Olson · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Martin Exploration Management Co. · Medina-Munoz v. Rj Reynolds Tobacco Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 142 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“support plausible but conflicting inferences on a pivotal issue in the case, the judge may not choose between those inferences at the summary judgment stage.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[C]ontracting parties cannot be held liable for the occurrence of a crime within their company’s premises, unless the same are of a nature that demand a wider scope of protection and security than can be supplied by law-enforcement agencies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.