United States v. Reddick’s Empirical Analysis
53 F.3d 462 · 1995
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably United States v. Whitebird (1995), United States v. Forman (2009)
10 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3582 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Chapman v. United States · Del Toro v. United States · Dirring v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an interpretation [that] would require use of public funds to pay the cost of counsel”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.