Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 F.3d 723 - Dutcher v. Ingalls Shipbuilding

Dutcher v. Ingalls Shipbuilding’s Empirical Analysis

53 F.3d 723 · 1995

Citation profile

274
cited by 274 later decisions
8
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

111 federal appellate · 21 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 274 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably Kelly v. Drexel University (1996), Rogers v. International Marine Terminals, Inc. (1996)

111 federal appellate · 21 district · 13 state decisions

1610199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12102 (§ 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12112 (§ 102 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)

Relies on Chandler v. City of Dallas · Messerschmidt v. United States · Jasany v. United States Postal Service · Kahan v. Seror

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 274 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(i) Unable to perform a major life activity that the average person in the general population can perform; or (ii) Significantly restricted as to the condition, manner or duration under which an individual can perform a particular major life activity as compared to the condition, manner, or duration under which the average person in the general population can perform the same major life activity.”
    19 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “significantly restricted in the ability to perform either a class of jobs or a broad range of jobs in various classes as compared to the average person having comparable training, skills and abilities. The inability to perform a single, particular job does not constitute a substantial limitation in the major life activity of working.”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(A) The geographical area to which the individual has reasonable access; (B) The job from which the individual has been disqualified because of an impairment, and the number and types of jobs utilizing similar training, knowledge, skills or abilities, within that geographical area, from which the individual is also disqualified because of the impairment (class of jobs); and/or (C) The job from which the individual has been disqualified because of an impairment, and the number and types of other jobs not utilizing similar training, knowledge, skills or abilities, within that geographical area, from which the individual is also disqualified because of the impairment (broad range of jobs in various classes).”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.