Smith Barney Inc. v. Schell’s Empirical Analysis
53 F.3d 807 · 1995
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 4
Relies on At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers · Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc. · PAINEWEBBER INCORPORATED v. Willard S. HARTMANN, Leona R. Hartmann, Appellants · Edward Jones Company v. Sorrells · Painewebber Inc. v. Farnam
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No dispute, claim, or controversy shall be eligible for submission to arbitration under this Code where six (6) years have elapsed from the occurrence or event giving rise to the act or the dispute, claim or controversy. This section shall not extend applicable statutes of limitations, nor shall it apply to any case which is directed to arbitration by a court of competent jurisdiction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]hether Section 15 bars a claim from submission to the arbitrators is for the court to decide, and it is irrelevant whether the arbitrators have already ruled on the question.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Section 15 is a substantive 'eligibility requirement' properly decided by the courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.