Weaver v. Maass’s Empirical Analysis
53 F.3d 956 · 1995
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Engle v. Isaac · Tristani v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. · Watson v. United States · Board of Pardons v. Allen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Weaver fail[ed] to identify any particular rule that, in 1983, required or permitted the Board to reconsider at later hearings its initial refusal to place an inmate in the matrix.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cornell v. Maass“Overall, reductions shall be limited to a maximum of 20% of the prison term under review unless a majority of the Board approves a further reduction....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“) appeals the district court's denial of his habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Cornell argues that the Oregon Board of Parole (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cornell v. Maass
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.