Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

53 F. App'x 264

Haughton v. Galley

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided December 19, 2002

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-12-19

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2003

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2002-12-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Kevin Haughton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude *265 for the reasons stated by the district court that Haughton has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Haughton v. Galley, No. CA-01-2562-PJM (D. Md. June 6, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED.

/53/fappx/264 · .json · Public domain