Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

53 F. App'x 310

Roberts v. Thompson, Sec

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided December 31, 2002

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-12-31

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2003

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2002-12-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Douglas G. Roberts appeals from the district court’s order denying relief in his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Roberts v. Thompson, No. CA-02-1225AW (D. Md. filed Sept. 19, 2002; entered Sept. 20, 2002). We deny Roberts’ request for an injunction staying his termination and granting backpay, interest and benefits. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

/53/fappx/310 · .json · Public domain