Dolgow v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 1991
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co. · Brady v. United States · Green v. Wolf Corp. · Dolgow v. Anderson · Swanner v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“trial court has a duty . . . to supervise and limit discovery to protect parties and witnesses from annoyance and excessive expense. . . .[The court's] discretion to limit discovery is necessarily broad.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.