In re Master Key’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2002
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hickman v. Taylor · United States v. Procter & Gamble Co. · United States v. Correll · Interstate Commerce Commission v. J-T Transport Co. · Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Commissioner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. . . the burden of deriving or ascertaining the answer is substantially the same for the party serving the interrogatory as for the party served . . ..”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.