Alamida v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 6 district · 44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Pacific Rent-All, Inc. (1999), Rawson v. City of Omaha (1982)
8 federal appellate · 6 district · 44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rodrigues v. State · Lesnik v. Public Industrials Corp. · Benatar v. United States · United States v. Acord · State v. Pokini
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b) Opening Brief. Within 60 days after the filing of the record on appeal, the appellant shall file an opening brief, containing in the order here indicated: * * * (5) A concise statement of the points on which appellant intends to rely, set forth in separate, numbered paragraphs. Each point shall refer to the alleged error upon which appellant intends to rely and shall show the manner in which it is raised, with a reference to the record where the same may be found. * * *”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`Where property of one person is used in discharging an obligation owed by another or a lien upon the property of another, under such circumstances that the other would be unjustly enriched by the retention of the benefit thus conferred, the former is entitled to be subrogated to the position of the obligee or lienholder.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'broad enough to include every instance in which one party pays a debt for which another is primarily answerable, and which in equity and good conscience should have been discharged by the latter.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.