State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
1 district · 23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently December 2011
1 district · 23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dohany v. Rogers · City of Buffalo v. J. W. Clement Co. · 6 Cal. 3d 141 - County of Los Angeles v. Ortiz · Territory of Hawaii v. Adelmeyer · Leadville Water Co. v. Parkville Water District
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““An expert witness may not, however, serve as a mere conduit for the hearsay opinion, the factual basis of which is not established through evidence, of another expert who does not testify when the expert who does testify lacks the requisite qualifications to render the opinion in his own right,” State v. Davis, 53 Haw. 582 , 499 P.2d 663, 669 (1972).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.