Johnson v. Young’s Empirical Analysis
1932
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2013
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on House v. Los Angeles County · Franzke v. Fergus County · Morse v. Granite County · Scollay v. County of Butte
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““1. To sue and be sued. “2. To purchase and hold lands within its limits. “3. To make such contracts, and purchase and hold such personal property, as may be necessary to the exercise of its powers. “4. To make such orders for the disposition or use of its property as the interests of its inhabitants require. “5. To levy and collect such taxes for purposes under its exclusive jurisdiction as are authorized by law.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.