53 Ill. App. 3d 1027 - Portock v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably 70 Ill. App. 3d 1039 - Rosenblatt v. Michigan Avenue National Bank (1979), 91 Ill. App. 3d 222 - Allabastro v. Wheaton National Bank (1980)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. United States · 44 Ill. 2d 412 - Deckard v. Joiner · 49 Ill. 2d 131 - Fultz v. Haugan · 21 Ill. App. 3d 396 - Green v. Green · 30 Ill. App. 3d 224 - Norris v. Board of Fire & Police Commissioners
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * on motion made within the time provided by this rule or any extension thereof. The extensions of time granted in the trial court for filing the report of proceedings shall not aggregate more than 42 days in addition to the 49 days allowed by this rule. Further extensions of time may be granted only by the reviewing court or a judge thereof on motion made before the expiration of the original or extended time, or on motion filed within 35 days thereafter * * *.” (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hall v. Turney““Except as provided in paragraph (b) below, the notice of appeal must be filed with the clerk of the circuit court within 30 days after the entry of the final judgment appealed from, or, if a timely post-trial motion directed against the judgment is filed, whether in a jury or a nonjury case, within 30 days after the entry of the order disposing of the motion.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““However, since plaintiff’s motion was made not within, but after expiration of, the allowed initial 49-day period, the trial court was without authority to grant this extension. [Citations.] Thus, the order of February 5, based on plaintiff s untimely motion, was void and without effect.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Henry v. Waz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.