Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 KANAPP2D 44 - State v. White

State v. White’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Virginia v. Black · State v. Ward · Lothian Cassidy, L.L.C. v. Lothian Oil Inc. · State v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Given the Douglas court went directly to the issue of prejudicial conduct, without deciding the issue, we will assume for the purposes of this opinion the use of the word ridiculous is outside the wide latitude allowed prosecutors during closing argument.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “'forbids the doing of an act in terms so vague that persons of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application.' [Citations omitted.].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the prosecutor's remarks, standing alone, would have been reversible error had the jury not been instructed to disregard it”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.