53 Md. App. 403 - Wyche v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently March 2019
2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Fay v. Noia · Porter v. United States · Williams v. State · Midgett v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“) (quoting Rutherford v. Rutherford , 296 Md. 347 , 360-61, 464 A.2d 228 (1983) ) (emphasis removed). Additionally, "if the right upon which the allegation is premised is a fundamental right, the allegation will not be deemed waived simply because it was not raised at a prior proceeding.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“1. [Whether] the record expressly reflects that the defendant had a basic understanding of the nature of the right which was relinquished or abandoned; and 2. [Whether] the record expressly reflects acknowledgement that the relinquishment or abandonment of that right was made or agreed to by the defendant.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“If the right alleged to have been violated is a non-fundamental right, waiver will be found if it is determined that the possibility existed for the petitioner to have raised the allegation in a prior proceeding, but he did not do so.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.