People v. Millard’s Empirical Analysis
1884
Citation profile
1 district · 36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently August 1972 · most notably People v. Seaman (1895), Harvey v. Silber (1942)
1 district · 36 state decisions — followed in 18 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hamilton v. People · People v. Hall · Pinney v. Cahill · Wood v. Barker · Geary v. People
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In every criminal case the burden is throughout upon the prosecution.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““Upon medical questions, while persons may testify whose knowledge is chiefly theoretical, there can be no question of the superior value of practical knowledge, combined, with theoretical, especially on such matters as involve the interpretation of symptoms and actions of the sick.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Seaman“Expert evidence is only admissible on the theory that the jury cannot be supposed to comprehend the significance of facts shown by other testimony which needs scientific or peculiar explanation by those who do comprehend it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.