United States v. Egan’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2004
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 822 · 10 U.S.C. § 823 · 10 U.S.C. § 866 · 10 U.S.C. § 880
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Bruton v. United States · Ohio v. Roberts · California v. Green · Idaho v. Wright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In analyzing the admission of [the sworn] statements, we will determine first, whether the statements were made against penal interest; second, whether the statements needed to be and were trustworthy; third, whether the individual [redacted] statements within the larger statements were admissible; and fourth, whether any improperly admitted statements harmed the appellant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.