United States v. Collazo’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 838 · 10 U.S.C. § 854 · 10 U.S.C. § 866 · 10 U.S.C. § 920
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Grostefon · United States v. Goode · United States v. Ginn · United States v. Wheelus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As we noted in Collazo, 53 M. J. at 725 n. 4: The increasing number and regularity of other post-trial processing errors heighten our concern. These errors indicate a lack of attention to detail, a lack of understanding as to proper post-trial processing requirements, or a lack of urgency because the case is “post-trial” and there are no meaningful sanctions for tardy or sloppy work. Whatever the reason, this attitude has to change.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.