Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

53 N.C. App. 515

Glenn v. Glenn

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 18, 1981

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · decided 1981-08-18

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 2017

5 state decisions

Relies on 3 N.C. App. 149 - Zande v. Zande · Tyndall v. Tyndall

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1981-08-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

WHICHARD, Judge.

¶1A father is not entitled to an accounting from the mother for sums paid to her for support of the children pursuant to a consent *516judgment. Tyndall v. Tyndall, 270 N.C. 106, 153 S.E. 2d 819 (1967); Zande v. Zande, 3 N.C. App. 149, 164 S.E. 2d 523 (1968). No reason appears for a different rule when such sums are paid pursuant to a separation agreement rather than a consent judgment. The cases cited indicate that the cause of action for misuse of the money paid pursuant to a consent judgment arises on behalf of the children rather than the father. The children, as third party beneficiaries of the contract between the parents, would likewise be the proper parties in an action for an accounting for money paid pursuant to a separation agreement.

¶2Affirmed.

Chief Judge Morris and Judge Webb concur.
/53/ncapp/515 · .json · Public domain