Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 N.C. App. 67 - Withrow v. Webb

53 N.C. App. 67 - Withrow v. Webb’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
6
states following
January 2009
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently January 2009 · most notably Tandra S. v. Tyrone W. (1994), 73 N.C. App. 331 - Heavner v. Heavner (1985)

25 state decisions

100198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 253 Pa. Super. 171 - Commonwealth Ex Rel. Palchinski v. Palchinski · Wright v. Wright · Commonwealth ex rel. Weston v. Weston · Watts v. Watts · Peercy v. Peercy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Even if the principle of res judicata were not applicable, it would seem to us that to grant the motion for a blood-grouping test on this record, would open the door to unwarranted challenges of paternity, violate public policy, and clearly result in irreparable harm to the child whose parents appear to be bent on harassing one another.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]hat a judgment rendered by a court having jurisdiction to do so finding paternity to exist bars the relitigation of that issue by the parties to the original judgment is a well established rule of law in other jurisdictions that have considered the question. [Citations omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.