State v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 2003 · most notably 7 Cal. 3d 186 - People v. Superior Court (1972), State v. Bruzzese (1983)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden · Preston v. United States · Harris v. United States · Tilton v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Following the return of the indictment, he moved to suppress the lottery slips which had been taken from his person at the time of his arrest. His motion was denied and, after a waiver of jury trial, he was tried before Judge Hayden and was found guilty. In reversing the conviction, the Appellate Division took the position that while the officer had the right to pat-down for weapons he had no right to remove the envelope and inspect its contents. It relied upon the limitations voiced in the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Campbell“Upon his arrest, the defendant was charged with violations of R.S. 39:3-56 (lack of a lighted headlight), R.S. 39:3-29 (lack of possession of driver's license and registration certificate) and R.S. 39:3-10 (lack of driver's license). He was later indicted for unlawfully and knowingly having”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Campbell“. He felt a bulge, put his hand in the pocket where the bulge was located, and pulled out a large envelope which contained smaller envelopes and lottery slips. The pat-down, in the officer's language, was”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Campbell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.