State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 1994
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3501
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · McNabb v. United States · Mallory v. United States · Illinois Power Co. v. Local Union No. 51, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers · Orozco v. Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the magistrate, not the police officer, is the proper person to advise an apprehended person of his rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Jones“. He made a telephone call and then signed a statement in which he said he lunged at Charles”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Jones“that defendants should be advised of their rights as soon as possible after the arrest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Jones
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.