Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 NY 31 - Pinckney v. . Hegeman

Pinckney v. . Hegeman’s Empirical Analysis

1873

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 1945
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 1945

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

2018731880189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The court had jurisdiction of the action, and complete power and control over the proceedings and' process in it; and hence it might set aside this execution, as one of the proceedings and as a process in the action.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.