¶1 reads for reversal and new trial, unless plaintiff consents to deduct interest from date of notes to date of assignment, and, if so modified, judgment affirmed.
¶2 Ordered accordingly.
53 N.Y. 620
Cooley v. . Howe Machine Company
Decided June 10, 1873
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1873-06-10
On the 18th October, 1871, one Edwin D. Barber being indebted to defendant in the sum of $36,439.34, sold and assigned to it certain personal… Held: that the assignment was' a fixed arrangement for plaintiff’s benefit, which could not be changed without payment of the plaintiff’s debt, so far as covered by it, and that the action was maintainable (see Ga/msey v. Rogers, 47 N. Y., 233), but that defendant was not liable beyond the $600, with interest from the date of the…
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1889
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1873-06-10
View the full empirical analysis of this case →